-
Website
http://the16art.com -
Original page
http://the16art.com/2007/04/03/common-web-design-mistakes/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
jogging double stroller
2 comments · 1 points
-
gatess
2 comments · 1 points
-
Guangzhou Tour
2 comments · 1 points
-
cufflinks
3 comments · 2 points
-
Guilin Tour
2 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Validation is also a tricky situation. Do you go for loose, or strict? You don't really offer insight as to the pitfalls or benefit of either or why 100% valid code is beneficial to a visitor.
Some of your stuff I would just nitpick; like "Click Here" to me is still an acceptable form of hyper-linking in limited situations (and particularly useful to people who aren't really that familiar with links; yes they are out there).
But one thing I would add. "Small Fonts". I had to squint to read this list.
Yes I will elaborate in more detail on another entry, in this one I just wanted to give an overview of all mistakes to avoid.
I normally go for HTML or XHTML Transitional and rarely strict.
100% valid code in my opinion is beneficial for search engines ranking because they'll spider the site much better, most visitors probably won't notice the difference unless the website is badly coded. However valid code may increase a website's speed therefore user experience.
I have to disagree with when saying that “Click Here†is acceptable, I always try to use anchor text that is relevant. This practice is highly advisable from the SEO point of view.